Tag Archives: Mainstream Media

Phil Robertson: Political Casualty of War Against European Americans

29 Dec

As far as I am concerned Phil Robertson merely spoke what many of us elect to keep to ourselves about the scourge of homosexuality. He exercised the courage to express the disapproval of this decadent lifestyle from a biblical perspective, but I believe it goes further than taking a moral stand.  Phil Robertson is a European American, and he went out on the limb as one of our own and defied the political correctness that has enslaved us as a people for too damn long. It was a sublime act of defiance against the anti-White and anti-Christian culture celebrated in the mainstream media. The television show, Duck Dynasty, has become a cash cow for the tribe- but they were not going to allow their feeding hand to be bit by some insolent male Goy who had the courage to speak his mind, or, in other words, to be true to his race by acting like any morally confident White man. Courage is the value of our people. Let anyone be damned who thinks that we of the White Community are going to remain silent because of some speech restrictions imposed by some overpaid Cultural Marxist executives in the controlled media.

The controlled media is a domestic enemy against the United States Constitution.  I am speaking about the same media that deliberately corrupts the American people to make them less like a Phil Robertson, and more like a Miley Cyrus. Yes, deliberately corrupt the American people to keep them docile and compliant like sheep on their way to the political slaughter house of NWO enslavement. Sounds like a “domestic enemy against the United States Constitution” does it not? And all this pseudo-pontification coming from liberal pundits over Phil Robertson’s statements are to be viewed as political speech salvos against our people. The sooner we realize that the controlled media, i.e. ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, and Fox News, is not our friend but our enemy the sooner we can collectively counter-attack with truth and promotion of our own values. We are at war people!  Phil Robertson is a casualty in a political speech war against the controlled media, which begs the question as to who is doing the controlling.  I will leave it up to the reasonably informed reader to answer the question because I do not want to digress from where I am going with the political speech point I am trying to make.

Do not think for a second that the news and entertainment we are bombarded with has no political agenda behind it?  Keep in mind that there is an enforcement of public policy, for example, in the homosexual agenda being pushed in the news and in the entertainment we are exposed to. All the criticism of Phil Robertson from the liberal pundits is the enforcement of that public policy. The public policy concerning the homosexual agenda has already been enforced in our American military under the guise of equality and tolerance.  Public policy is simply what those who weld political power want the American people to be enslaved under. Yes, the homosexual agenda is all about slavery because it is a public policy attempt to force us to concede to that which is morally repugnant to those who want to preserve our people though the traditional institute of marriage.  Strong families stem from strong marriages, which, in turn, contribute to the numeric and moral strength of our people. And the last thing our enemies want is a strong people, both in numbers and in character.

When Phil Robertson took his stand he represented every European American who had enough of the politically correct tyranny that strives to undermine us through restrictions on our political speech through economic means, which is particularly loathsome because it attempts to deprive us of our daily bread when we act upon a God-given right compelled by a moral conscience.  Any employer who would fire an employee, for acting upon a God-given right compelled by a moral conscience, leaves no doubt as to what master he serves.  Under such conditions of enslavement the case for creating an explicit White Community becomes even stronger.  Only a brainwashed dupe or an outright enemy of our people would deprive racially-conscious European Americans the right of association, by forming an explicit White Community to ensure ones daily bread through honest work without the threat of politically-motivated economic deprivation. Until that day comes European American nationalists must endure the tyranny through self-employment to enable them to more freely take a stand for their people, or risk being terminated by an employer for taking such a stand. Need I remind you that liberty is defined by acting upon your moral conscience to serve your God? What liberty does a European American nationalists have if public policy is at war against his desire to do what is right?  Yes, it has come down to the point where doing what is right is an act of war against the enemies of our people. Phil Robertson engaged in an act of war against the enemies of our people, knowingly or not.

If a political and cultural war is what we have then what choice are you going to make? Fight, stand down- or flee? I say “fight,” but I speak for myself because it is an individual decision to engage in a group effort to fight considering the personal costs involved.  Ironically, higher personal costs will be exacted by deciding to stand down or flee from the good fight for our people.  The war is too big for one man to fight it alone, but it is based on an individual decision to join with other like-minded men and women who already decided to take a stand.  What happened to Phil Robertson should be a reminder to all of us that this is a war against us, and it is personal because it involves you, your spouse, and your children.  You, your culture, and your values are hated beyond measure by the enemies of our people. Fight back with your right of political speech or lose everything because history already has shown what happens to our people when our enemies reached a point of complete political tyranny: genocide!  Look at what happened to the White Christians during the Bolshevik Revolution under Lenin in Russia, and look at what is happening today to the White Christian farmers under the communist regime in South Africa.  What you see may be in store for us if we stand down or flee from the good fight for our people.

© 2013, Paul M. Lovett


A Nation under God or Cultural Marxism

13 Sep

The Jewish controlled mainstream media is complicit in the genocidal murders of White Christians by Blacks in South Africa, because they deliberately imposed a media blackout by not reporting it, knowing full well that this blackout would help perpetuate the atrocities. If this genocide was reported by the mainstream media lives could have been saved, but because of Political Correctness, i.e. Cultural Marxism, my fellow brothers and sisters in Christ are being slaughtered by Communist Black savages.

Because of President Obama’s political sympathies with the likes of Communist such as Nelson Mandela, who sung about killing Whites as shown on YouTube, he refuses to call for the end to these atrocities because saving the lives of these White farmers, I believe, conflicts with the narrative that the moral authority of the Communist regime must not be questioned, which again is in keeping with Political Correctness. On Saturday, August 24, 2013, it was the 50th anniversary of Martin Luther King’s famous “I Have a Dream” speech, which was written by his personal adviser Stanley Levinson, a member of the Communist Party who received funding from the Soviet Union. How do you expect me, a White Anti-Communist Christian, to celebrate this speech? For the sake of Political Correctness? I will not honor this speech because these civil rights leaders refuse to at least acknowledge that the White farmers of South Africa also have the most basic right given by God: life- which is a more sacred right than the civil right for a pauper to vote for a traitor of the Constitution for more welfare benefits. What is the reason for this exclusion of White genocide in the mainstream civil rights dialogue?

The civil rights leaders have an agenda, which is the political disenfranchisement of White Americans for the benefit of themselves and the people they represent, as demonstrated by their push to end the Stand Your Ground laws, which are intended to enable people to defend themselves regardless of race from vicious life-threatening attacks, as it was in the case of George Zimmerman. In other words, these civil rights leaders would rather have White Americans risk their lives , and at the same time have one of their own protected when they viciously attack White Americans, thereby in effect denying White Americans the God-given right of self defense in such situations. Is this the “civil right” that these civil right leaders want to protect: the right for violent Blacks to viciously attack Whites without the risk of fatality that may result from the victim acting on the God-given right of self defense? Is this the “equality” that these civil right leaders are seeking, which smacks of George Orwell’s book, Animal Farm, which depicted a fictional society where the pigs lectured on “equality” by reminding the animals on the farm that they themselves were more equal than all other animals?

The civil rights movement has kept the ugly head of its Communist roots from public view with its socially acceptable calls for racial equality under the law, but with the protests calling for the repeal of the Stand Your Ground laws the ugly head has inadvertently shown itself, through an underhanded attempt via political intimidation the means to disarm White Americans so as to wage a more successful racial war against them. The deafening silence coming from the civil rights leadership, over the death threats against Whites in response to Travon Martin’s death from their more thuggish Black sympathizers, is a blatant revelation of their refusal to bring moderation to the civil discourse that one would expect from the civil rights leadership. But instead of calling for moderation from their own in the Black community, especially from their violence-prone Facebook and Twitter account holders, the NAACP has requested a compliant administration to pursue civil charges against George Zimmerman for killing Travon Martin out of self-defense, thereby aggravating further the living hell of a man who valued his life enough to protect himself from possible death, through what I believe to be the reluctant but necessary use of lethal force.  Furthermore, calls to end the violence against White Americans from the civil rights leadership, in reaction to the verdict from the Black community, have not been forthcoming-even when framed as a universal appeal to human decency, which should be the common civil denominator between Blacks and Whites.

Opportunities to quell violence have been deliberately ignored by the civil rights leadership- and for good reason. For a successful campaign to politically disenfranchise White Americans different tactics must be used against them. One tactic of choice, in light of the demonstrated motivation and proclivity towards violence among their young and able-bodied, but emotionally undisciplined and weak-minded, is physical intimidation. And it was physical intimidation that was used by the New Black Panther Party in the 2008 presidential election with the intention of unlawfully precluding Whites from going to the polls, which may have contributed toward bringing Obama into office.

I believe that it is the fear of physical intimidation from Black thugs that is partly keeping our people from venturing out of the relatively safe confines of the Internet onto the streets. The hard right-turn of taking our cause to the streets to protest our oppression must be made to render the physical intimidation ineffectual- and to contribute towards the success of our cause by not only making it visible to the people at large, but to inspire our people to action. We cannot count on any other group to stand up for us. Their apathy for our oppression, and their hostile misunderstanding of our cause, does not qualify them to take a stand for us. We are alone and deserving of this struggle because we have tolerated the oppression as cowards as we took solace in the material indulgence afforded by our affluence, rather than fight the good fight of defending our White Christian heritage against the cultural subversion of political correctness. No pleasant diversion will relieve us of the spiritual pain that comes from the realization of losing our American birthright before our very eyes through amnesty and Third World immigration. The jeers of being labeled racist and anti-Semitic for defending your American birthright will sound weak and desperate to you as you come to realize that the purported edifice of Cultural Marxism is but a flimsy house of cards against the refreshing breeze of truth and liberty authored by God.  What confidence can compare to the one that only comes from following the will of God which is this: defending our American birthright, which is a nation of our own under God, not a nation under Cultural Marxism?

© 2013, Paul M. Lovett

Apathy to White Oppression is Complicity to White Oppression

23 Aug

Many political commentators appear to be at a lost for words in response to the blatant and deliberate exclusion of White subjection to violent crime as an issue of social oppression. Despite the mainstream media blackout of abundant incidences of horrendous crimes against Whites by parasitic Black savages the visibility of a clear pattern is evident, thanks to the courageous discussions initiated and promoted by a refreshing new breed of political commentators on the Internet who I believe only answer to their conscience. One example that comes to my mind are two responsible and intelligent political commentators who represent White interests, Joseph De Adams and John King of The White Voice at http://thewhitevoice.com/. Their effectiveness in expressing their balanced but uncompromising views through YouTube has earned them the noble distinction of being temporarily banned for courageously violating the community standards of what I believe to be Cultural Marxism. I watched John King’s passionate moral indictment of White conservatives that was genuine and on target one day on YouTube. His unapologetic stance on the hypocrisy of White conservatives, with their cowardly silence to White oppression, spoke to my personal frustration with these types. It is comforting to know that I am far from alone in speaking out against what could fairly be defined as White oppression in the worse way it can be perpetrated, which is through murder of our own by these parasitic Black savages who have selfishly fed off the industry of our people with an utter lack of gratitude through confiscatory taxation schemes and communistic wealth distribution, i.e. funding of government schools through property taxes for those who pay nothing for education, and the social welfare scheme of food stamps for able-bodied men and women who prefer government dependency to work. The recent murder of an Australian college baseball player, Chris Lane, exemplifies the utter contempt these parasitic Black savages have for God’s will as expressed through the creation of our race, which has been a demonstrable source of beneficence to mankind by virtue of our shared high regard for liberty, truth, industry and beauty as values that have guided our race through our historical struggles, achievements, and at times ignoble mistakes. The opportunity and potential for achievement that was residing in this promising young man has been denied to him, to humanity, and particularly to our people. Every murder committed by these parasitic Black savages against us is a threat to our existence when contemplated in the cultural context of widespread apathy across racial lines- even our own I am sad to say. What endangerment does this apathy have to our existence as a people?

When murders against our people are blacked out by the mainstream media, through the utter absence of dialogue among the pundits regarding the context of these evil acts as a threat to our existence as a people, then it should not surprise us that many people will be apathetic by not seeing these murders as existential threats. Such murders fall into the mainstream narrative as isolated incidences. When reported in the mainstream media these murders eventually fall into the memory hole, given the public’s short term perspective on current events, which the mainstream media understandably takes advantage of by the passing manner it presents the news. However, thanks to the Internet we are reminded, albeit sporadically, of certain outrageous murders such as the atrocious slaying of Christopher Newsom and Channon Christian by parasitic Black savages who I believe were  guided by monstrous demons, given the unspeakably hideous manner they chose to carry out their evil deed. Nevertheless, we cannot escape the issue of apathy among our own because it is that apathy that has enabled this pattern of social oppression. The part of the reason for this apathy , I believe, is the dehumanizing and culturally destructive influence of Cultural Marxism in American society , and to our people in particular.

The untold evisceration of our people’s will, by the insidious subversion of Cultural Marxism from the Frankfurt School, to effectively stand up in unity against these parasitic Black savage murders of Whites in the context of them being an existential threat, is a testament to the diabolical cleverness of Cultural Marxism. It is not an exaggeration to state that Cultural Marxism, i.e. political correctness, is a ethical code and subversive ideology that our enemies have sought to effectively establish to replace the one that our people have followed for centuries, that being Christianity and the Holy Bible. The evidence for this understandably bold statement is preponderant. For example, the acceptance of same-sex marriage by many as an expression of humanitarian tolerance to alternative lifestyles, in the spirit of celebrated equality and progressive understanding, is promoted in utter contradistinction to the unmistakeable clear biblical teaching forbidding homosexuality. I want to borrow the term “inversion” used by the prominent Canadian White Nationalist Paul Fromm to define the ethical code of Cultural Marxism, which he eloquently expressed in a speech he gave regarding the ascendancy of Obama and Clinton as the politicians of choice representing the Democratic Party. Cultural Marxism is an inversion of Christianity. Its proselytizers seek to overthrow the Christian foundation of our Western Civilization, and in particular our American Constitutional Republic. Make no mistake, with the acceptance of homosexuals in the military the Cultural Marxists have succeeded to undermine our perceived moral authority to condemn this evil practice, because a major respected institution in our American society has accepted it as a specious appeal to the highly regarded value of privacy. The public trust has been violated by this change in policy because this open compromise in the ethical standard held for generations, which is used to rightly measure the moral character of the men and women who are presently serving, is damaging to our national security and survival. The spiritual repercussions of the American military tacitly renouncing Christ through this change in policy are staggering to the imagination of true believers.  The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom, but our leaders choose the foolishness of human pride that decides what is right and wrong outside of God’s will. And when such major and respected institutions follow the ethical code of Cultural Marxism to defy Christian morality we can expect that apathy will follow because no society can effectively hold obedience as a whole to God as important while disobedience is at the same time is accepted, even celebrated as in the case of homosexuality. Therefore, it should not be presumptuous  to expect that the importance of the Christian prohibition against murder has been mitigated by Cultural Marxism, given the low regard that this ethical worldview has for our civilization and, by default, our people. Let us conjecture as to how the apathy stemming from the lack of importance placed on such prohibitions were formed in the weak and corrupted minds of the parasitic Black savages who killed Chris Lane.

The uncensored calls to kill Whites promulgated in rap music is all too evident to require any need to elaborate. With a lack of outrage by Whites for this overt expression of racial genocide only substantiates the idea in the weak and corrupt minds of these parasitic Black savages that there is a marked lack of importance in the life of a White man such as Chris Lane. The dynamic of our observation of such apathy from our own people can further belittle the importance  of defending our honor as a people. If, for example, the respected Black actor, Jamie Fox, can crack jokes about his killing of White folks in the vile movie, Django Unchained, to a predominantly White audience then what can be said of the apathy that many of our own people have in the life of one of our own as our own? Plenty- and embarrassingly so I might add. I could go on and on as to the reason I believe to be the pervasive cultural force behind the demoralization of our people that has led to the point where Black parasitic savages can murder a White man and laugh about it. That pervasive cultural force, that reason for our demoralization, is Cultural Marxism, which is the inversion of Christianity, and it is the ideological orthodoxy of the Left, formulated by a cadre of Jewish Marxist intellectuals back in the early 1920’s who sought to literally destroy Western civilization from within, and by default destroy us as a people. And our sycophantic obedience to this subversive ideology is especially sickening when you think of the purpose of this ideology, which is demonic as it attempts to destroy us- literally. Therefore, our self destruction, our apathy, is our complicity to the death of our people. Many readers may regard my argument as a shrill exaggeration, an over-the-top diatribe, given the seemingly anecdotal incidences of Black on White murder. Need I refer to the documented systematic genocidal murder of White Boer farmers by parasitic Black savages, which is blacked out of the Jewish dominated mainstream media? If truth is anti-Semitic or racist then so be it in the skewed minds of the politically correct because I have a low regard for such coined terms, given their origination from certain subversive Jews, namely the murderous Communist Jew Leon Trotsky who coined the term “racist.” So as a good anti-Christ Communist sympathizer please feel free to glibly use the term “racist” against me so as to vindicate that I am following God’s will. A day will come when the Cultural Marxists and their cowardly sympathizers will soil themselves in fear of a resurgent White resistance to the subversive Jewish tyranny of the heart and mind, which is Cultural Marxism; the inversion of Christianity and the ideological poison to my race. Lastly, my frequent use of the phrase “parasitic Black savages,” was reserved exclusively for the Black murderers of my people. I remained tempered but uncompromising in my indictment, which I would expect from my fellow brothers in Christ from other races, including the Black race because God does not show favoritism.

© 2013, Paul M. Lovett