Archive | Cultural Marxism RSS feed for this section

The Coca Cola Super Bowl Commercial of 2014: Legal Terrorism against European Americans

8 Feb

European Americans who care about the future of their people refuse to tolerate their displacement in the country that their ancestors built from the beginning. Coca Cola decided to demean our heritage by using their vast financial resources and influence, by way of deliberately foisting upon an unsuspecting public a clever propaganda campaign of celebrating multiculturalism as the defining set of norms for America, in place of the traditional American culture derived from the beneficent societal outreach of Western Civilization.  This underhanded assault on our values exemplifies the corporate thrust of emphasizing foreign cultural encroachment on America as a virtue, when it fact it is utter viciousness to proposition the replacement of our values with those that reflect a worldview hostile to maintaining the heritage of freedom bequeathed to our people by the sacrifices of our ancestors in the establishment of our great country.

America is the civilized extension of Europe with a culture friendly to the encouragement of progress toward advancing all peoples of the world.  As the Third World invasion of our land displaces our people from the livelihoods held as an inheritance promised by our founders as “blessings of liberty” we are left with the silencing of our voice, resulting from the unlawful registration of illegal aliens as voters for legal plunder of our hard-earned wealth as socialist politicians get elected, on the promise of continued legal plunder for the benefit of themselves and their parasitic foreign constituencies.

Coca Cola revealed their domestic enemy credentials by casting illegal aliens in the most favorable light as the offending commercial left the impression that America was poised to change permanently, symbolized by a foreign language incorporated in a patriotic song originating from our beloved and shared English language.  Rather than defending our American heritage as a company founded in our country Coca Cola chose to attack it with the promotion of foreign cultures intended to replace our own.  There is no other fair assessment to make of this treason other than to say that this was an attack on our American culture, which is an attack on us as a people as in war.  What are European Americans left to do in moral reaction to this attack?

Boycott is the answer to a company who has the disloyalty to promote multiculturalism at the expense of European Americans.  Any company that decides to challenge our rightful place as beneficiaries of the blessings of liberty will be met with righteous indignation in the form of organized protest by concerned European Americans who see such challenges for what they really are: threats against us as a people.  Make no mistake; there is a clarion understanding among those who see such attacks as acts of war against us because war is understood to take different forms- not just the use of lethal weaponry. Psychological warfare is being waged to demoralize European Americans by influencing them to think that cultural and political displacement is not only to be regarded as inevitable but welcomed.

We were shown warm, friendly, and familial imagery intended to convey the message that accepting our displacement would be universally regarded as a virtuous act by foreigners.   Conversely, allowing large populations of Third Worlders into our country would be regarded as a moral act by us as well- but only if we allow ourselves to be taken in by the false notion that such pathological altruism is virtuous. The commercial becomes especially pernicious because it attempts to make us feel good about ourselves for surrendering our heritage to those who care very little about the sacrifices of our ancestors on our behalf.  Fortunately, many European Americans had enough sense to call out the commercial for the social engineering attempt that it was.

Coca Cola took advantage of the large and vast viewing audience of the Super Bowl so as to have the intended impact of successfully catering to the changing demographics in favor of Third Worlders at the expense of European Americans.  As all such global corporations are primarily driven by profit and increased market share Coca Cola saw the opportunity to appeal to multiculturalism as the dominant norm of American society as expressed in the changing demographics.  And by default the traditional American culture that derived from Europe is summarily dismissed by Coca Cola as having only passing consideration, given the initial symbolic display of a European American boy in Western apparel so as to convey the genocidal reality that his culture was being supplanted in America by those foreign to his own.

The alleged intended cognitive dissonance imposed upon the minds of European Americans was also evident as the streaming images of friendly foreign faces were incongruent to the dire economic and political threat of Third World illegal immigration on our people, resulting in the attendant need to attain psychic balance by way of accepting the foreigners as an act of virtue so as to assuage the emotional unpleasantness of the perceived threat. In other words, pathological altruism from European Americans became the intended response elicited by Coca Cola in my view.  A blatant offense, as opposed by a more subtle approach shown by the commercial, would be more easily detected by the majority of European American viewers.  However, it became increasingly clear that primarily racially-conscious European Americans would be the ones sounding the alarm- and that they did; thanks to the good people who spearheaded the boycott against Coca Cola to bring attention to the corporate demoralization of our people.

Planned demoralization of an ethnic group through psychological warfare is a form of terrorism. Therefore, Coca Cola is hiding behind the First Amendment to wage legal terrorism against our people.  Corporations have portrayed European American men in their commercials as buffoons, with the intended consequence of demoralizing them to the point of sapping their will to fight back.  Demeaning portrayals of European American men in entertainment as well are not coincidental. Our men are targeted as such because they are the leaders of our people.  They are seen as a primary threat to those who will not abide to any challenge to their New World Order domination.  Coca Cola, and global corporations like them, represent the New World Order.  And it is our duty to not reject the challenge because without us to fight back this enemy will win by default.  Let us not allow such an ignoble negligence of duty be something for the remnant of our posterity to remember us by in a possible future of widespread genocide of our people

© 2014, Paul M. Lovett


Genuflection to MLK is Idolatry Against God

8 Oct

As I was surfing the Internet to find the name of the director of the NAACP chapter of Augusta, Georgia for research purposes I came across a serendipitous find that shed all pretenses of a non-partisanship regarding civil rights from the city’s mayor, based on a certificate from his office to recognize “AUGUSTA BRANCH NAACP FREEDOM FUND DAY.” The claim on the certificate that King’s “Dream” was to improve the quality of life for all people is a patent lie, shown by the euphemistically termed “affirmative action” public policy of hiring Blacks over more qualified Whites, which King endorsed without reservation. King was a plagiarist, womanizer, and a Communist in everything but name given his subversive political affiliations. The certificate can be found at As an anti-Communist White Christian I refuse to pull back my verbal punches because I have seen for myself how my generation has lost its birthright of the “blessings of liberty’ for a bowl of Cultural Marxist slop.

Much of this lost of our birthright is due to the socially engineered adulation of this Communist god MLK by the mainstream media. The early Christians refused to give allegiance to Caesar as their god because it would be the ultimate betrayal against the True God over All Creation, which resulted in their most certain execution: their martyrdom in holding steadfast to the faith. Likewise, I choose to follow the example of my past Christian brethren in spirit by refusing to honor a reprobate man who used the cleric collar to advanced a political agenda championed by unbelievers and Christ-haters. The movement to replace our “God-given rights” with government-granted “civil rights” has become institutionalized for those who should be institutionalized for giving up our blessings of liberty without a fight against the Communist-inspired civil rights movement- a movement that was set out to destroy the freedoms of White Americans for not only during that tumultuous time in our history but for the generations that followed to this very day.

The ignominious status of our people, in groveling for the crumbs of government recognition of our legitimate grievance of political disenfranchisement resulting from illegal immigration, needs to be replaced by the dignified but strident affirmation of the importance of citizenship through the confident demand to strip these illegal immigrants of all voting rights by requiring documentation with no apologies. If you are a Mexican here illegally then show your papers so we can deport you back to your country because America is not your country. America is our country, founded by Whites and founded for Whites according to the Founding Fathers. And if that sounds too mean to you because of the exclusiveness of the message then it needs to be said as such so you can hear the righteous indignation in my voice through these printed words. My country was 90% White when I was born back in 1961, and now it is somewhere around 60% today. Do you expect me to join in the “Diversity is Our Strength” chorus with these genocidal statistics?  Not a chance.

I am angry, and I have no qualms in telling you in your face that my people are being killed by Black savages because they are White, and I am not going to play the role of a conservative pantywaist and refuse to condemn the murderous Black savages for the scum that they are, because that would be an insult to the dignity of my people. Yes, my people. White People! Oh, that sounds so racist; does it not? Well, it only sounds racist to an anti-White lemming who would rather jump off the cliff because many others are doing the same thing by allowing the enemies of our people free reign in the public square. I would rather follow the example of George Lincoln Rockwell when he tore down the Viet Cong flag because of the seditious stand this vile flag was making in a country that is suppose to be for freedom. The same applies to the homosexual Christ-haters who flaunt their disdain for God’s righteousness, by falsely claiming the dignity of their perversion without shame. What these Christ-hating homosexuals need is a confrontation by God-fearing White Christian men who are not afraid to call a spade a spade, and call these perverts out as an abomination to God and His Holiness.

No more tolerance for the idolatry of genuflecting to MLK, which the entire subversive collective is based on for its existential legitimacy. And once the idol is destroyed for the sake of Jesus Christ the entire subversive collective has no moral stand to enforce its tyranny over us, because the “civil rights” replacement of our God-given rights would show itself for the lie and the sham that it is. Thank God for the Internet because not a peep of the truth about MLK would be uttered via the Jewish dominated mainstream media. In due time the truth will finally win over the lie, and freedom for our people will be ours at last!

© 2013, Paul M. Lovett

A Nation under God or Cultural Marxism

13 Sep

The Jewish controlled mainstream media is complicit in the genocidal murders of White Christians by Blacks in South Africa, because they deliberately imposed a media blackout by not reporting it, knowing full well that this blackout would help perpetuate the atrocities. If this genocide was reported by the mainstream media lives could have been saved, but because of Political Correctness, i.e. Cultural Marxism, my fellow brothers and sisters in Christ are being slaughtered by Communist Black savages.

Because of President Obama’s political sympathies with the likes of Communist such as Nelson Mandela, who sung about killing Whites as shown on YouTube, he refuses to call for the end to these atrocities because saving the lives of these White farmers, I believe, conflicts with the narrative that the moral authority of the Communist regime must not be questioned, which again is in keeping with Political Correctness. On Saturday, August 24, 2013, it was the 50th anniversary of Martin Luther King’s famous “I Have a Dream” speech, which was written by his personal adviser Stanley Levinson, a member of the Communist Party who received funding from the Soviet Union. How do you expect me, a White Anti-Communist Christian, to celebrate this speech? For the sake of Political Correctness? I will not honor this speech because these civil rights leaders refuse to at least acknowledge that the White farmers of South Africa also have the most basic right given by God: life- which is a more sacred right than the civil right for a pauper to vote for a traitor of the Constitution for more welfare benefits. What is the reason for this exclusion of White genocide in the mainstream civil rights dialogue?

The civil rights leaders have an agenda, which is the political disenfranchisement of White Americans for the benefit of themselves and the people they represent, as demonstrated by their push to end the Stand Your Ground laws, which are intended to enable people to defend themselves regardless of race from vicious life-threatening attacks, as it was in the case of George Zimmerman. In other words, these civil rights leaders would rather have White Americans risk their lives , and at the same time have one of their own protected when they viciously attack White Americans, thereby in effect denying White Americans the God-given right of self defense in such situations. Is this the “civil right” that these civil right leaders want to protect: the right for violent Blacks to viciously attack Whites without the risk of fatality that may result from the victim acting on the God-given right of self defense? Is this the “equality” that these civil right leaders are seeking, which smacks of George Orwell’s book, Animal Farm, which depicted a fictional society where the pigs lectured on “equality” by reminding the animals on the farm that they themselves were more equal than all other animals?

The civil rights movement has kept the ugly head of its Communist roots from public view with its socially acceptable calls for racial equality under the law, but with the protests calling for the repeal of the Stand Your Ground laws the ugly head has inadvertently shown itself, through an underhanded attempt via political intimidation the means to disarm White Americans so as to wage a more successful racial war against them. The deafening silence coming from the civil rights leadership, over the death threats against Whites in response to Travon Martin’s death from their more thuggish Black sympathizers, is a blatant revelation of their refusal to bring moderation to the civil discourse that one would expect from the civil rights leadership. But instead of calling for moderation from their own in the Black community, especially from their violence-prone Facebook and Twitter account holders, the NAACP has requested a compliant administration to pursue civil charges against George Zimmerman for killing Travon Martin out of self-defense, thereby aggravating further the living hell of a man who valued his life enough to protect himself from possible death, through what I believe to be the reluctant but necessary use of lethal force.  Furthermore, calls to end the violence against White Americans from the civil rights leadership, in reaction to the verdict from the Black community, have not been forthcoming-even when framed as a universal appeal to human decency, which should be the common civil denominator between Blacks and Whites.

Opportunities to quell violence have been deliberately ignored by the civil rights leadership- and for good reason. For a successful campaign to politically disenfranchise White Americans different tactics must be used against them. One tactic of choice, in light of the demonstrated motivation and proclivity towards violence among their young and able-bodied, but emotionally undisciplined and weak-minded, is physical intimidation. And it was physical intimidation that was used by the New Black Panther Party in the 2008 presidential election with the intention of unlawfully precluding Whites from going to the polls, which may have contributed toward bringing Obama into office.

I believe that it is the fear of physical intimidation from Black thugs that is partly keeping our people from venturing out of the relatively safe confines of the Internet onto the streets. The hard right-turn of taking our cause to the streets to protest our oppression must be made to render the physical intimidation ineffectual- and to contribute towards the success of our cause by not only making it visible to the people at large, but to inspire our people to action. We cannot count on any other group to stand up for us. Their apathy for our oppression, and their hostile misunderstanding of our cause, does not qualify them to take a stand for us. We are alone and deserving of this struggle because we have tolerated the oppression as cowards as we took solace in the material indulgence afforded by our affluence, rather than fight the good fight of defending our White Christian heritage against the cultural subversion of political correctness. No pleasant diversion will relieve us of the spiritual pain that comes from the realization of losing our American birthright before our very eyes through amnesty and Third World immigration. The jeers of being labeled racist and anti-Semitic for defending your American birthright will sound weak and desperate to you as you come to realize that the purported edifice of Cultural Marxism is but a flimsy house of cards against the refreshing breeze of truth and liberty authored by God.  What confidence can compare to the one that only comes from following the will of God which is this: defending our American birthright, which is a nation of our own under God, not a nation under Cultural Marxism?

© 2013, Paul M. Lovett

Apathy to White Oppression is Complicity to White Oppression

23 Aug

Many political commentators appear to be at a lost for words in response to the blatant and deliberate exclusion of White subjection to violent crime as an issue of social oppression. Despite the mainstream media blackout of abundant incidences of horrendous crimes against Whites by parasitic Black savages the visibility of a clear pattern is evident, thanks to the courageous discussions initiated and promoted by a refreshing new breed of political commentators on the Internet who I believe only answer to their conscience. One example that comes to my mind are two responsible and intelligent political commentators who represent White interests, Joseph De Adams and John King of The White Voice at Their effectiveness in expressing their balanced but uncompromising views through YouTube has earned them the noble distinction of being temporarily banned for courageously violating the community standards of what I believe to be Cultural Marxism. I watched John King’s passionate moral indictment of White conservatives that was genuine and on target one day on YouTube. His unapologetic stance on the hypocrisy of White conservatives, with their cowardly silence to White oppression, spoke to my personal frustration with these types. It is comforting to know that I am far from alone in speaking out against what could fairly be defined as White oppression in the worse way it can be perpetrated, which is through murder of our own by these parasitic Black savages who have selfishly fed off the industry of our people with an utter lack of gratitude through confiscatory taxation schemes and communistic wealth distribution, i.e. funding of government schools through property taxes for those who pay nothing for education, and the social welfare scheme of food stamps for able-bodied men and women who prefer government dependency to work. The recent murder of an Australian college baseball player, Chris Lane, exemplifies the utter contempt these parasitic Black savages have for God’s will as expressed through the creation of our race, which has been a demonstrable source of beneficence to mankind by virtue of our shared high regard for liberty, truth, industry and beauty as values that have guided our race through our historical struggles, achievements, and at times ignoble mistakes. The opportunity and potential for achievement that was residing in this promising young man has been denied to him, to humanity, and particularly to our people. Every murder committed by these parasitic Black savages against us is a threat to our existence when contemplated in the cultural context of widespread apathy across racial lines- even our own I am sad to say. What endangerment does this apathy have to our existence as a people?

When murders against our people are blacked out by the mainstream media, through the utter absence of dialogue among the pundits regarding the context of these evil acts as a threat to our existence as a people, then it should not surprise us that many people will be apathetic by not seeing these murders as existential threats. Such murders fall into the mainstream narrative as isolated incidences. When reported in the mainstream media these murders eventually fall into the memory hole, given the public’s short term perspective on current events, which the mainstream media understandably takes advantage of by the passing manner it presents the news. However, thanks to the Internet we are reminded, albeit sporadically, of certain outrageous murders such as the atrocious slaying of Christopher Newsom and Channon Christian by parasitic Black savages who I believe were  guided by monstrous demons, given the unspeakably hideous manner they chose to carry out their evil deed. Nevertheless, we cannot escape the issue of apathy among our own because it is that apathy that has enabled this pattern of social oppression. The part of the reason for this apathy , I believe, is the dehumanizing and culturally destructive influence of Cultural Marxism in American society , and to our people in particular.

The untold evisceration of our people’s will, by the insidious subversion of Cultural Marxism from the Frankfurt School, to effectively stand up in unity against these parasitic Black savage murders of Whites in the context of them being an existential threat, is a testament to the diabolical cleverness of Cultural Marxism. It is not an exaggeration to state that Cultural Marxism, i.e. political correctness, is a ethical code and subversive ideology that our enemies have sought to effectively establish to replace the one that our people have followed for centuries, that being Christianity and the Holy Bible. The evidence for this understandably bold statement is preponderant. For example, the acceptance of same-sex marriage by many as an expression of humanitarian tolerance to alternative lifestyles, in the spirit of celebrated equality and progressive understanding, is promoted in utter contradistinction to the unmistakeable clear biblical teaching forbidding homosexuality. I want to borrow the term “inversion” used by the prominent Canadian White Nationalist Paul Fromm to define the ethical code of Cultural Marxism, which he eloquently expressed in a speech he gave regarding the ascendancy of Obama and Clinton as the politicians of choice representing the Democratic Party. Cultural Marxism is an inversion of Christianity. Its proselytizers seek to overthrow the Christian foundation of our Western Civilization, and in particular our American Constitutional Republic. Make no mistake, with the acceptance of homosexuals in the military the Cultural Marxists have succeeded to undermine our perceived moral authority to condemn this evil practice, because a major respected institution in our American society has accepted it as a specious appeal to the highly regarded value of privacy. The public trust has been violated by this change in policy because this open compromise in the ethical standard held for generations, which is used to rightly measure the moral character of the men and women who are presently serving, is damaging to our national security and survival. The spiritual repercussions of the American military tacitly renouncing Christ through this change in policy are staggering to the imagination of true believers.  The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom, but our leaders choose the foolishness of human pride that decides what is right and wrong outside of God’s will. And when such major and respected institutions follow the ethical code of Cultural Marxism to defy Christian morality we can expect that apathy will follow because no society can effectively hold obedience as a whole to God as important while disobedience is at the same time is accepted, even celebrated as in the case of homosexuality. Therefore, it should not be presumptuous  to expect that the importance of the Christian prohibition against murder has been mitigated by Cultural Marxism, given the low regard that this ethical worldview has for our civilization and, by default, our people. Let us conjecture as to how the apathy stemming from the lack of importance placed on such prohibitions were formed in the weak and corrupted minds of the parasitic Black savages who killed Chris Lane.

The uncensored calls to kill Whites promulgated in rap music is all too evident to require any need to elaborate. With a lack of outrage by Whites for this overt expression of racial genocide only substantiates the idea in the weak and corrupt minds of these parasitic Black savages that there is a marked lack of importance in the life of a White man such as Chris Lane. The dynamic of our observation of such apathy from our own people can further belittle the importance  of defending our honor as a people. If, for example, the respected Black actor, Jamie Fox, can crack jokes about his killing of White folks in the vile movie, Django Unchained, to a predominantly White audience then what can be said of the apathy that many of our own people have in the life of one of our own as our own? Plenty- and embarrassingly so I might add. I could go on and on as to the reason I believe to be the pervasive cultural force behind the demoralization of our people that has led to the point where Black parasitic savages can murder a White man and laugh about it. That pervasive cultural force, that reason for our demoralization, is Cultural Marxism, which is the inversion of Christianity, and it is the ideological orthodoxy of the Left, formulated by a cadre of Jewish Marxist intellectuals back in the early 1920’s who sought to literally destroy Western civilization from within, and by default destroy us as a people. And our sycophantic obedience to this subversive ideology is especially sickening when you think of the purpose of this ideology, which is demonic as it attempts to destroy us- literally. Therefore, our self destruction, our apathy, is our complicity to the death of our people. Many readers may regard my argument as a shrill exaggeration, an over-the-top diatribe, given the seemingly anecdotal incidences of Black on White murder. Need I refer to the documented systematic genocidal murder of White Boer farmers by parasitic Black savages, which is blacked out of the Jewish dominated mainstream media? If truth is anti-Semitic or racist then so be it in the skewed minds of the politically correct because I have a low regard for such coined terms, given their origination from certain subversive Jews, namely the murderous Communist Jew Leon Trotsky who coined the term “racist.” So as a good anti-Christ Communist sympathizer please feel free to glibly use the term “racist” against me so as to vindicate that I am following God’s will. A day will come when the Cultural Marxists and their cowardly sympathizers will soil themselves in fear of a resurgent White resistance to the subversive Jewish tyranny of the heart and mind, which is Cultural Marxism; the inversion of Christianity and the ideological poison to my race. Lastly, my frequent use of the phrase “parasitic Black savages,” was reserved exclusively for the Black murderers of my people. I remained tempered but uncompromising in my indictment, which I would expect from my fellow brothers in Christ from other races, including the Black race because God does not show favoritism.

© 2013, Paul M. Lovett