Archive | September, 2013

Platform of the Constitution Party of Georgia

19 Sep

Platform of the Constitution Party of Georgia


A Nation under God or Cultural Marxism

13 Sep

The Jewish controlled mainstream media is complicit in the genocidal murders of White Christians by Blacks in South Africa, because they deliberately imposed a media blackout by not reporting it, knowing full well that this blackout would help perpetuate the atrocities. If this genocide was reported by the mainstream media lives could have been saved, but because of Political Correctness, i.e. Cultural Marxism, my fellow brothers and sisters in Christ are being slaughtered by Communist Black savages.

Because of President Obama’s political sympathies with the likes of Communist such as Nelson Mandela, who sung about killing Whites as shown on YouTube, he refuses to call for the end to these atrocities because saving the lives of these White farmers, I believe, conflicts with the narrative that the moral authority of the Communist regime must not be questioned, which again is in keeping with Political Correctness. On Saturday, August 24, 2013, it was the 50th anniversary of Martin Luther King’s famous “I Have a Dream” speech, which was written by his personal adviser Stanley Levinson, a member of the Communist Party who received funding from the Soviet Union. How do you expect me, a White Anti-Communist Christian, to celebrate this speech? For the sake of Political Correctness? I will not honor this speech because these civil rights leaders refuse to at least acknowledge that the White farmers of South Africa also have the most basic right given by God: life- which is a more sacred right than the civil right for a pauper to vote for a traitor of the Constitution for more welfare benefits. What is the reason for this exclusion of White genocide in the mainstream civil rights dialogue?

The civil rights leaders have an agenda, which is the political disenfranchisement of White Americans for the benefit of themselves and the people they represent, as demonstrated by their push to end the Stand Your Ground laws, which are intended to enable people to defend themselves regardless of race from vicious life-threatening attacks, as it was in the case of George Zimmerman. In other words, these civil rights leaders would rather have White Americans risk their lives , and at the same time have one of their own protected when they viciously attack White Americans, thereby in effect denying White Americans the God-given right of self defense in such situations. Is this the “civil right” that these civil right leaders want to protect: the right for violent Blacks to viciously attack Whites without the risk of fatality that may result from the victim acting on the God-given right of self defense? Is this the “equality” that these civil right leaders are seeking, which smacks of George Orwell’s book, Animal Farm, which depicted a fictional society where the pigs lectured on “equality” by reminding the animals on the farm that they themselves were more equal than all other animals?

The civil rights movement has kept the ugly head of its Communist roots from public view with its socially acceptable calls for racial equality under the law, but with the protests calling for the repeal of the Stand Your Ground laws the ugly head has inadvertently shown itself, through an underhanded attempt via political intimidation the means to disarm White Americans so as to wage a more successful racial war against them. The deafening silence coming from the civil rights leadership, over the death threats against Whites in response to Travon Martin’s death from their more thuggish Black sympathizers, is a blatant revelation of their refusal to bring moderation to the civil discourse that one would expect from the civil rights leadership. But instead of calling for moderation from their own in the Black community, especially from their violence-prone Facebook and Twitter account holders, the NAACP has requested a compliant administration to pursue civil charges against George Zimmerman for killing Travon Martin out of self-defense, thereby aggravating further the living hell of a man who valued his life enough to protect himself from possible death, through what I believe to be the reluctant but necessary use of lethal force.  Furthermore, calls to end the violence against White Americans from the civil rights leadership, in reaction to the verdict from the Black community, have not been forthcoming-even when framed as a universal appeal to human decency, which should be the common civil denominator between Blacks and Whites.

Opportunities to quell violence have been deliberately ignored by the civil rights leadership- and for good reason. For a successful campaign to politically disenfranchise White Americans different tactics must be used against them. One tactic of choice, in light of the demonstrated motivation and proclivity towards violence among their young and able-bodied, but emotionally undisciplined and weak-minded, is physical intimidation. And it was physical intimidation that was used by the New Black Panther Party in the 2008 presidential election with the intention of unlawfully precluding Whites from going to the polls, which may have contributed toward bringing Obama into office.

I believe that it is the fear of physical intimidation from Black thugs that is partly keeping our people from venturing out of the relatively safe confines of the Internet onto the streets. The hard right-turn of taking our cause to the streets to protest our oppression must be made to render the physical intimidation ineffectual- and to contribute towards the success of our cause by not only making it visible to the people at large, but to inspire our people to action. We cannot count on any other group to stand up for us. Their apathy for our oppression, and their hostile misunderstanding of our cause, does not qualify them to take a stand for us. We are alone and deserving of this struggle because we have tolerated the oppression as cowards as we took solace in the material indulgence afforded by our affluence, rather than fight the good fight of defending our White Christian heritage against the cultural subversion of political correctness. No pleasant diversion will relieve us of the spiritual pain that comes from the realization of losing our American birthright before our very eyes through amnesty and Third World immigration. The jeers of being labeled racist and anti-Semitic for defending your American birthright will sound weak and desperate to you as you come to realize that the purported edifice of Cultural Marxism is but a flimsy house of cards against the refreshing breeze of truth and liberty authored by God.  What confidence can compare to the one that only comes from following the will of God which is this: defending our American birthright, which is a nation of our own under God, not a nation under Cultural Marxism?

© 2013, Paul M. Lovett